(EDIT- NOW WITH A HALFA$$ CLIP) long boring amp report) Finally got a new amp...it's not what I wanted

jeffb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
2,378
Reaction score
5,568
but I've been pleasantly surprised.

As some of you know, I finally changed the housing situation I was in but at my new place I'm limited in volumes due to close neighbors and I'm likely here for the next couple of years. I tried a few different alternatives to my CODE 25 that I won't bore everyone with, but I was not able to get any results that were better than what I have been getting and things/amps were returned.

I want something simple and with just a couple different good sounds that would work with my existing pedals. It should also have the ability to get more complicated *IF* I wanted to, not an amp that would require me to tweak for hours to get something. So, after a ton of trial and error, I tried the Line 6 Catalyst 60 knowing I'd hate it and it would go on the list of "amps/options that didn't work out"

It's actually pretty damned good and I'm keeping it. Modelling has come a long way, even in the budget friendly price range. It's not a tube amp of course. But it sounds quite good at lower volumes. Better than similar or even higher priced modelling gear from the other big boys. Better than some hybrid amps. Way better than my CODE and VOX modelers. Better than my attenuated tube amps.

PROS-
It sounds very much like a normal tube amp in the room (I back to backed it with my tube amps). I was really surprised here. I like it better than it's main competitor because it's not ALL midrange like those amps are- it has some highs and (lots) of low end for an open back cab.

It does all the edge of breakup to "vintage gain" stuff WAY better than most. This was super surprising. So many lesser modelers fail at that loud Blackface Fender or Malcolm Young tone thing.

There is a pre-set "boost" for each model that can really change the amp to something that seems like an entirely different model. For example- The "Chime" model is straight AC15-ish, but when you turn the boost on (and you don't have to even add any additional gain on the boost) it is now treble boosted AC30 ala Rory Gallagher and Brian May. Completely different sound.

Speaking of VOX- it seems reviewers are in love with the "Boutique" model, and it's very good (sort of Dumble-ish) but I was completely floored how good the "Chime" model is. In your face/barky mid forward Class A projection and extremely well done VOX simulation. I don't usually like VOX type amps with humbuckers, but this is fun. With Beck's recent passing, I've been getting my Yardbirds kicks here.

The "Crunch" is a cranked plexi type thing between a V30 and GB type tonality- nasal, punchy, and very percussive attack more like a 50 watter than a 1959. If you cannot get your Zeppelin II, Aerosmith, UFO, or early Rush on with this model, IDK how to help you ;) Boost mode is more 80s mod plexi.

The high gain is not my thing and it seems reviewers are not terribly impressed. Maybe they are looking for Rectumfrier tone? To me this is more like late 80s Metal Church, or Helloween type thing.

Dynamic is based on the engineer’s actual modded Traynor amp. It's no more or less dynamic than the rest of the models really- they all respond well to your touch and volumes for a digital amp. But it's probably a bit more versatile in that you can dial in a variety of sounds. More modern sounding “crunch”.

And speaking of, this EQ is EXTREMELY responsive and powerful on these models. You can get quite a few good usable and different tones out of each model just tweaking the EQ.

The effects sound quite good. In some cases, they are better than my expensive pedals. And they can be placed PRE (yay!) or POST (boo!) the amps. I'm old school so this was a big thing for me.

Speaker break is key. It's midrangey/warm and stiff at first, but once it starts to open up after a several hours the tones and feel really start to get good.

It can be used as a power amp for any modeler and is voiced to work well in this regard. This was a factor in my purchase, as many people say this works fairly well with their Helix (et.al) and the HX stomp is where I'm going if I want to go down the rabbit hole.

Power attenuation that works- Full power, half power, 1/2 watt, or mute. Designed to help compensate with tweaking in your tone at full power and not having to completely re-do if you need to drop your volume. That said the master volume works well. I've been using it in (half power) 30 watt mode with lower master, and 1/2 watt mode with higher master and both give me good albeit slightly different tones at the same volume.

It has an editor for your computer and phone so you can tweak a bit and save up to 12 pre-sets. It's not as complex or comprehensive as BOSS but doesn’t seem meant to be. The Catalyst is more of an amp for old cranks like me: Dial in the amp tones on the amp easily, with a bit of computer tweaking available for those who must. I think this probably is better for the editing of the effects, which is a bit of a PITA from the amp itself.

It seems sturdy and built fairly well for an amp in this price range. The CODE and VOX VTX construction feels like a cheap 5 and 10 store toy from the 1970s. If I just handled the Cat without knowing, I'd say it was an amp in the $600 range.

NEUTRAL points
Feel- it's stiffer than a tube amp but it is immediate with no perceptible latency. It does not quite have the natural compression feel and attack of tubes, but it's also not a lifeless "flub" and disconnect when you attack the strings like on the CODE or many other inexpensive modeling amps (and with the $ increase, CODE is no longer "inexpensive"- it's a rip off at new pricing). I'm guessing feel will continue to get better w/ the speaker breaking in more and more. PLUS- there are controls for Sag and Bias in the editor. Looking forward to tweaking those to see what happens.

Footswitch is optional. I'm on the fence here. For a KISS (keep it simple, stupid) type modeler, it should just come with the FS- there are no other complex FS options like other line 6 products to where guessing the consumer's needs/wants is a problem. That said, the amp is very inexpensive to begin with, and I'd rather that extra $ be put into the engineering budget to design a better amp sound. The FS can be (re) programmed in the editor to give some variation in what it is able to turn on and off.

Digital glitchy- overall this thing does not scream "digital" to me when I'm playing like most inexpensive modeling amps do- however the EQ and gain settings are very powerful and at a certain point when you go too far (especially with the presence or gain) all of a sudden you get into that zone where it starts to obviously sound digital. Doing a neck pickup woman tone (tone control rolled off) I do get some weird ghost notes that get less offensive if I’m using delay or reverb, but that’s the only issue I have had.

CAB models- I'd like to be able to select cab models or utilize IRs like it’s more complex brethren. Somedays I want a G12M tone, some days a H30 tone, some days an Alnico tone, and being able to have speaker options like on my CODE is something I miss. However, I have to remind myself that the Cat series was designed to be a simpler plug and play amp, not a wealth of options. I also have to remind myself that I am highly susceptible to Analysis Paralysis and I just want to plug in and play and have it work without tweaking all the damn time. And finally, I have to remind myself that while the Marshall amp models are passable renditions of the original amps, most of the cab sims on the CODE are absolutely awful renditions of the real cabs, especially the 1960X. You can tweak cab sim and mics for the XLR and headphones out though, so you can get variety there.

CONS
As many reviewers mention it has two glaring issues- one literally, one figuratively.

The amp model select button has a glowing ring around it which indicates the amp model selected- it's very poorly done and in certain situations is hard to tell which model you are on because of glare/lack of clarity.

The effects selection and tweaking them on the amp itself rely on the amp selection button to scroll through parameters, and pressing and holding/turning other buttons, and it's hard to tell WTF you are doing with no screen. They got the AMP section right- dial in quickly and easily and the effects sound quite good, but it's a PITA to dial in those effects. LINE 6 provides a amp overlay for the top of the amp to help here, but I'm guessing a new version of Catalyst will go to something more user friendly.

It's a computer. I have had pretty much zero luck with modeler reliability over the years. I played VOX hybrids for years, including the original high end ones, the pedalboard, and the lower end combo versions. I used them alone, into the effects loops of tube amps, and even utilized early Atomic tube power cabs, BITD. In time they all just started acting weird or died and no number of "resets" ever fixed them. Same issue with some Line 6 (Spyder, Flextone) and BOSS/Roland amps (Micro Cube RX). I did the most recent firmware update to my CODE recently and it sounds worse than it did before. I re-set it to factory but now it won't play nice with my laptop for recording. And that weird digital ghosting I mentioned above re: the CAT. Fricking computers.

Overall though I'm very surprised by the CAT60. It punches way above its price point. No, it won't hang with anyone's 4 holer or Friedman and a 4x12. But even for tube snobs like me one would have to admit that the gap is closing dramatically, even on the "introductory" designs- especially when we are talking about "in the room" feel and projection (which has been the major sticking point for me). I'm surprised this amp does not get more love on various forums. Don't let older "budget" line 6 products cloud your judgement (like it did mine).

I need a different USB cable than what I have for recordings, so clips will have to wait.
 

Clifdawg

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
349
Reaction score
813
Great review! As you can see from my PFP, I'm currently running one and decluttered to a single amp with a single pedalboard while I live with family while building a house. I too was extremely surprised by the "off-clean" and "crunch" sounds on this amp - to me, this is where the amp excels, and I firmly believe there's nothing else shy of about a grand that does these sounds as well as the Cat 60 does. It's also a fantastic live unit, as you can run it in by XLR and either use the speaker as a monitor or mute it as a DI.

Don't bother with the footswitch. In what is possibly the most brain-dead oversight of this entire amp (and there are many), there is a very noticeable gap between channel switching where sound drops out entirely. It's like... 1/4-1/3 of a second? I was hoping I could reconfigure the pedal to toggle both the reverb and the boost, but alas - the software only allows reconfiguration of a single button, as one is dedicated to channel switching. So now I have that set to boost and just never swap channels.

I was not overly impressed with using the "power amp in" for my NUX MG-30, as I couldn't dial out that "fake" sound even with a parametric EQ. I could, however, get it sounding pretty good running into the clean channel. I rarely use the amp models on the MG-30 anyway.

Here's how my rig is set up now, and now that I've worked around some of it's quirks, it's absolutely a keeper:

Behringer Super Fuzz SF300 (which can be used as either a low-octave fuzz or a clean boost) into a Westminster Effects 2716 Distortion (basically a Mesa Dual Rec Revision F in-a-box) into the MG-30, which acts a tuner, noise gate, and pre-EQ, and defaults to a patch where I can switch in chorus, analog delay, and hall reverb, directly into the "Clean" channel of the Catalyst 60. I then use the boost as a volume and mid lift as a "solo boost" of sorts, toggled by the footswitch.

I have a second channel set to "Crunch" with a little spring reverb and with relatively low gain for when I want to play softer, busier stuff and again use the footswitch to toggle the boost. I just run overdrive and delay directly into the front with my MG-30 utilizing a second patch.

This effectively lets me use the Cat 60 as two single-channel amps for my pedalboard and gives me a lot of functionality and flexibility - and sounds fantastic doing it! But as an all-in-one solution, the Cat 60 is just terrible, lol :lol:
 
Last edited:

Springfield Scooter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
1,941
Reaction score
3,164
Close neighbors....Limited volume.....I would think the Code 25 would be perfect for that scenereo.
 

Jethro Rocker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Messages
11,741
Reaction score
20,182
Location
Saskatoon, Canada
The FS can be (re) programmed in the editor to give some variation in what it is able to turn on and off.
I was looking at one of these as a backup / small venue amp for the other guitarist in band. The big issue I have is they never let you go from presets to panel with footswitch. Just ridiculous. Everything is a preset.
With the Katana 100 I can switch between presets for "special" tones, clean solo, etc, amd use panel for everythjng else just like any amp but not with the Katana 50 or this, it would appear. A bad oversight.
Can one program that here? It appears not....
 

jeffb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
2,378
Reaction score
5,568
Close neighbors....Limited volume.....I would think the Code 25 would be perfect for that scenereo.
Volume wise it absolutey works. I just couldn't take the synthetic digital and boxy sound after a couple years

It sounds like a recording of a recording, which drives me nuts.
 

jeffb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
2,378
Reaction score
5,568
I was looking at one of these as a backup / small venue amp for the other guitarist in band. The big issue I have is they never let you go from presets to panel with footswitch. Just ridiculous. Everything is a preset.
With the Katana 100 I can switch between presets for "special" tones, clean solo, etc, amd use panel for everythjng else just like any amp but not with the Katana 50 or this, it would appear. A bad oversight.
Can one program that here? It appears not....
No I don't believe it can do preset to manual with the FS.
 

jeffb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
2,378
Reaction score
5,568
Great review! As you can see from my PFP, I'm currently running one and decluttered to a single amp with a single pedalboard while I live with family while building a house. I too was extremely surprised by the "off-clean" and "crunch" sounds on this amp - to me, this is where the amp excels, and I firmly believe there's nothing else shy of about a grand that does these sounds as well as the Cat 60 does. It's also a fantastic live unit, as you can run it in by XLR and either use the speaker as a monitor or mute it as a DI.

Don't bother with the footswitch. In what is possibly the most brain-dead oversight of this entire amp (and there are many), there is a very noticeable gap between channel switching where sound drops out entirely. It's like... 1/4-1/3 of a second? I was hoping I could reconfigure the pedal to toggle both the reverb and the boost, but alas - the software only allows reconfiguration of a single button, as one is dedicated to channel switching. So now I have that set to boost and just never swap channels.

I was not overly impressed with using the "power amp in" for my NUX MG-30, as I couldn't dial out that "fake" sound even with a parametric EQ. I could, however, get it sounding pretty good running into the clean channel. I rarely use the amp models on the MG-30 anyway.

Here's how my rig is set up now, and now that I've worked around some of it's quirks, it's absolutely a keeper:

Behringer Super Fuzz SF300 (which can be used as either a low-octave fuzz or a clean boost) into a Westminster Effects 2716 Distortion (basically a Mesa Dual Rec Revision F in-a-box) into the MG-30, which acts a tuner, noise gate, and pre-EQ, and defaults to a patch where I can switch in chorus, analog delay, and hall reverb, directly into the "Clean" channel of the Catalyst 60. I then use the boost as a volume and mid lift as a "solo boost" of sorts, toggled by the footswitch.

I have a second channel set to "Crunch" with a little spring reverb and with relatively low gain for when I want to play softer, busier stuff and again use the footswitch to toggle the boost. I just run overdrive and delay directly into the front with my MG-30 utilizing a second patch.

This effectively lets me use the Cat 60 as two single-channel amps for my pedalboard and gives me a lot of functionality and flexibility - and sounds fantastic doing it! But as an all-in-one solution, the Cat 60 is just terrible, lol :lol:

Thank you.

As I have not been a gigging musician for many moons the fs latency is not really an issue for me.

I just needed a simple platform that would take some pedals. I'll most likely leave it set for one sound 90% of the time and rarely bother with the onboard effects barring the reverb.

That said, no doubt a Katana is a better solution for gigging, and as an all in one unit. I just don't like any of the tones barring the Jazz Chorus. The CAT sounds way better for the vintage gainy stuff I need/ want and I'll use my stomps for boosts and modulations.
 

Clifdawg

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
349
Reaction score
813
That said, no doubt a Katana is a better solution for gigging, and as an all in one unit. I just don't like any of the tones barring the Jazz Chorus. The CAT sounds way better for the vintage gainy stuff I need/ want and I'll use my stomps for boosts and modulations.

It’s strange, the Cat 60 is so close to being the new standard. All they really need to do is get rid of the footswitch latency and revamp the effects section to be more user friendly. I get frustrated by its limitations but I work around it because it just sounds so darn good! :thumb:
 

jeffb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
2,378
Reaction score
5,568
Which he literally explains that he tried and hated in the first paragraph
TBF I did post a wall of text and I'm sure most skim through if they didn't fall asleep first.🤣
 

Jethro Rocker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Messages
11,741
Reaction score
20,182
Location
Saskatoon, Canada
It’s strange, the Cat 60 is so close to being the new standard. All they really need to do is get rid of the footswitch latency and revamp the effects section to be more user friendly. I get frustrated by its limitations but I work around it because it just sounds so darn good! :thumb:
The Katana sounds super good, to me, for higher gain stuff, which is me. I don't care at all about low gain crunch.
But can they make the footswitches useful? Please?
I would love to try a Cat 60 but not at that rate.
 

Clifdawg

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
349
Reaction score
813
The Katana sounds super good, to me, for higher gain stuff, which is me. I don't care at all about low gain crunch.
But can they make the footswitches useful? Please?
I would love to try a Cat 60 but not at that rate.

I would probably prefer the Katana for high-gain stuff as well, the Cat 60's high gain is definitely usable but not amazing. I'm getting my high-gain from a Westminster effects 2716 distortion into the clean channel of the Cat 60 though, and that pedal is a beast. Definitely a top-tier amp-in-a-box. And fortunately, the Cat 60 takes pedals quite well.
 

Springfield Scooter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
1,941
Reaction score
3,164
Which he literally explains that he tried and hated in the first paragraph
I can read!

Volume wise it absolutey works. I just couldn't take the synthetic digital and boxy sound after a couple years

It sounds like a recording of a recording, which drives me nuts.
Im not sure if you still have the Code, but Im surprised it did not work well with your limitations on volume.
The Code factory presets were horrible out of the box.
The factory presets absolutely need some major tweaking!
I would think that amp would excel, given your limitation on volume.
But sounds like your enjoying the CAT, so looking forward to the sound samples!
 
Last edited:

jeffb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
2,378
Reaction score
5,568
I can read!


Im not sure if you still have the Code, but Im surprised it did not work well with your limitations on volume.
The Code factory presets were horrible out of the box.
The factory presets absolutely need some major tweaking!
I would think that amp would excel, given your limitation on volume.
But sounds like your enjoying the CAT, so looking forward to the sound samples!
I still have the CODE, yes.

And no, I NEVER use pre-sets. I always dial in by ear. Nor do I use anything but the cabs, pre's, and power amps. I don' use any of the effects in the amp or the modelled stomps.

It worked well enough as the stop gap I needed going from being able to play at moderate to loud volumes with 20-50 watts tubes amps, to having to play at very low, low TV volumes when I was renting downstairs out of my inlaws home. Now that I can get a bit more volume (but still have to keep things reasonable for the neighbors), the CODE's overtly digital nature and boxy rattle cab has really worn on me. Glitchy attack and digital compression, etc. To it's credit, the CODE did sound good direct into my computer/Audacity but after the recent re-set it keeps crashing my laptop or gets "locked up" and won't allow to me to adjust any parameters/tone controls.

I'd like to try and get some recordings of the actual CAT speaker and amp in the room vs. the direct sounds. I just haven't had enough hours on the weekend recently, and I've got relatives and friends visiting on and off over the next few weeks so will have to wait, unfortunately.
 
Last edited:

tallcoolone

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
3,780
Reaction score
8,092
Location
NH
I had the 100w Code head when it came out. I’m very comfortable with modelers and dialing them in but I just didn’t find anything inspirational enough to keep me working at it. I’m sure with time you could craft some useable tones and I’m sure on it’s own it would sound fine in a mix with the right sound guy but I spent a few hours with it and that was enough for me to decide I was moving on
 

jeffb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
2,378
Reaction score
5,568
I had the 100w Code head when it came out. I’m very comfortable with modelers and dialing them in but I just didn’t find anything inspirational enough to keep me working at it. I’m sure with time you could craft some useable tones and I’m sure on it’s own it would sound fine in a mix with the right sound guy but I spent a few hours with it and that was enough for me to decide I was moving on
Did you use it with a proper guitar cab and the cab sims off? or...?

IDK if the 100 had a line out/XLR out, but if it did I'd say that would be the only way I would want to use it- direct to the PA.

It was fun to dial up X sound from Y's live album on a CODE. I could approximate many of those recorded sounds I love pretty well and it would sit well jamming in the mix there, but that's about it. All by itself, it shows off it's....problems. But I'm hard to please- 42+ years of cranking tube amps and it's hard to find something as satisfying and inspirational.
 

tallcoolone

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
3,780
Reaction score
8,092
Location
NH
Did you use it with a proper guitar cab and the cab sims off? or...?
Yup exactly—that’s what I wanted out of the Code, to run it through guitar cabs. I had a Helix at the time which is on another level IME that I used going direct.
IDK if the 100 had a line out/XLR out, but if it did I'd say that would be the only way I would want to use it- direct to the PA.
I’m sure you are right there I did not give the Code much time going direct. I wanted to try a ‘modeling amp’ and when that didn’t do it for me I moved on.

Honestly I never like running modelers through guitar cabs/speakers, even when I had the Helix and Fractal. I don’t think the same patches/scenes work with both monitoring solutions, it’s not enough just lifting the IR
But I'm hard to please- 42+ years of cranking tube amps and it's hard to find something as satisfying and inspirational.
I hear ya there. I’ll own another high end modeler but just to go direct. That is where they inspire for me
 

Workerunit

New Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2022
Messages
19
Reaction score
23
Volume wise it absolutey works. I just couldn't take the synthetic digital and boxy sound after a couple years

It sounds like a recording of a recording, which drives me nuts.
Did you install the latest firmware?
 

jeffb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
2,378
Reaction score
5,568
Did you install the latest firmware?
Yes about 2 months ago, which helped with not locking the amp up when you try to save a patch issue, but the tone of the amp changed for the worse- the pick attack got more squishy and the amp got brighter, in a bad way.

I restored it to factory default and the sound improved, but then it went fubar when recording. Wont allow me to make any adjustments on the amp. Knobs just rotate but do nothing when its plugged into the laptop.

But the "recording of a recording" tone thing is just inherent to the design/model.
 

jeffb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
2,378
Reaction score
5,568
Though I've still not been able to do any recording, I did spend a good amount of time using various boosts and my modulations into the front of the amp.

Echoplex Pre
EP Booster
Bad Monkey (TS with active tone controls)

Mainly through the crunch channel but also the Chime.

also
Bogner LaGrange doing the MIAB thing through the Clean model

and for Modulations
TC Flashback (EP3 toneprint)
Belle Epoch
Behringer vintage delay (BOSS DM2 clone).
MXR Micro Chorus
Heptode Virtuoso (Maestrophase clone)

None of them gave me a hard time: all the gooses worked flawlessly. No weird oveloading/digital glitching from hitting the amp too hard. That said, I preferred the onboard modelled boost for the crunch channel- It cuts better then the echoplex pre boosts, and is less muddy compared to the bad monkey. Digital wins.

The LaGrange sounds very good into clean model but still could not compete with the Crunch model on the amp. Digital wins here too. Ironic thing (actually kind of sad, really) is that the LaGrange cost me the same amount of money ($250) when I bought it 5 years ago as the Catalyst did several weeks ago.

All the delays worked flawlessly as well. Configured the same way- in front of the amp- I believe the onboard echoplex model can be made to sound better than the EP3 Toneprint on the TC, but I will need to get into the Catalyst editor to tweak a few parameters to be 100% sure. The Belle Epoch though is the clear winner here: good enough for a picky bastard like Eric Johnson....

Chorus and Phaser also worked no issues.

So far the amp is doing exactly what I wanted- respond to my pedals just like my Marshall tube amps do. Have to say I'm thoroughly impressed with the CAT60 as it punches way above it's price point.
 

Latest posts



Top