Barack Obama and the Debt Crisis: A Successful Con Game Explained

DBi5

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
903
Reaction score
603
Barack Obama and the Debt Crisis: A Successful Con Game Explained.
By Bruce A. Dixon

August 04, 2011 "Information Clearing House" -- The phony debt ceiling crisis was, from beginning to end, a con. It was an elaborate and successful hoax in which the nation's first black president, the Democratic and Republican parties, Wall Street and corporate media all played indispensable parts. The object of the supposed “crisis” was to short circuit public opinion, existing law, democratic process and traditions of public oversight, in order to deal fatal blows to Medicaid, Medicare, social security, job growth and public expenditures for the common good. It worked. We've been conned.

President Barack Obama as First Actor in the Con
The key actor in the con was and is Barack Obama, leader of the Democratic party and president of the United States. When the Bush and Obama administrations bailed out the banksters in 2008, 2009 and 2010 they didn't print new warehouses of greenbacks and send them over in a fleet of trucks. The Federal Reserve simply opened its spreadsheets, and wrote numbers with lots of zeroes crediting the banksters' accounts. It literally created the new money by giving it away, and next proceeded to borrow those funds back from the banksters at interest. The debt ceiling crisis was nothing but those same banksters twirling their mustaches and oinking “Well, we don't think you (the government that created the money by giving it to them) can really afford to repay all these loans you've been taking out... We might have to downgrade your credit rating...”
The whole notion of excessive government indebtedness, or that government might not be able, as the president threatened, to issue or cash social security checks was always a crock, a sham. There was never, ever a moment when Barack Obama didn't know that his homey analogies about government having to live within its means just like a family were just cynical fairy tales.

The president could have prevented this “crisis” by passing a debt ceiling when he had a 50 vote majority in Congress for all of 2009 and 2010. He could have avoided it again by allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire. Instead the president renewed the Bush tax cuts when he had a 50 vote majority in Congress. The president could have defused it in the last month by any of a number of means, including simply calling it fake. But giving away the game is not what actors in a con do.

The Second Actor: Corporate Media
The second key actor in the con was and is the corporate media establishment. Media is nothing less than the sum total of the public conversation. Our corporate media is owned by a tiny group of greedy billionaires and soulless corporations who get to decide what most of us see and hear, what gets in and what gets left out of that supposedly public conversation. So corporate media cynically repeated the bankster's doubts about getting their free money paid back.

Over the years, corporate media moguls had manufactured an entire Matrix-like world of fake “money experts” and economists who assured us in the 90s that tech stocks would never go down, and in the 2000s that real estate prices would never decrease, and always that lower taxes on the rich would trickle down to create jobs for the poor.

For these masters of alternative realities, rebranding the white nationalist wing of the Republican party as “the tea party” portraying it as a mass movement, and riffing on a new/old set of lies about the government going broke were par for the course. Corporate media set the limits of the political discourse inside a false reality --- one where the myths that the US government could and might go broke, and where trickle down economics unquestioned facts. It portrayed the only political choices available in that universe as the president's accommodation vs the “tea party's” extremism.

The Third Actors: Republicans and their tea party faction
Every Jeff needs a Mutt, every good cop needs a bad cop. This was the role played by Republicans. Throughout the Obama presidency their job has been to refuse the president's pre-emptive compromises to meet them fifty, seventy, ninety percent of the way, moving the goal ever rightwards. Along the way a secondary function is to gratuitously insult the president, sometimes in openly racist terms, thus enabling some of the president's backers to try to rally black and progressive support around him despite his utter abandonment of any progressive agenda.

The power of Republicans and their tea party subsidiary to dictate the course of events has always been exaggerated. During the first two years of the Obama presidency they had no legislative majorities anywhere and could not even call a committee meeting. Even with a majority in the House since the beginning of this year, Republican power to do damage is always limited by the combined power of the Democratic White House and a large Democratic minority in Congress. Despite the insistence of Republicans and the power of corporate medial the imaginary “debt crisis” would not have existed unless the White House and Congressional Democrats co-signed it into existence.

The Fourth Actors, Hand Wringing Democrats, Progressives, and the Black Establishment

Last week we decided that Barack Obama, far from being weak, vacillating, and too spineless to stand up for the tens of millions of working and poor people who elevated him to office, was simply smarter than they were. Barack knows what side he's on --- only Democrats and so-called “progressives” don't know, or pretend not to know.

Every abusive relationship has two parts. There's an abuser, who does what he does, and there's an enabling victim who forgives and makes excuses for the abuser. When Democrats and progressives waste ink and air on President Barack Obama trying to “make him do it” or discoursing on his “weakness” and lac k of progressive backbone, they are effectively enabling his serial abuse by ascribing it to curable causes open to democratic remedies rather than deliberate intent and the people-proof mechanisms of their own party and of US governance in general. They enable their abuser.

The most pitiful and sometimes the most unprincipled of these are members of the Black Misleadership Class who support President Obama. The only card they have left is to point to the daily stream of racist quips and quotes from Republicans and tea partyers or Glen Beck, or whoever they can find that day calling the president a White House porch monkey, or some other racist epithet, as the reason to circle the wagons, squelch examination of Obama policies and silence criticism of his many betrayals in office of the cause of peace and justice.

The Directors of the Skit: Wall Street and Corporate America

Was there every really any danger of the US going broke? The stock market didn't crash. The holders of US Treasury bonds didn't try to unload them with this horrific train wreck a mere 24 hours distant. That was because they knew the train and the tracks were imaginary, they knew it was a hoax. They knew that President Obama could have declared it a foolish stunt and ignored it. They knew they would get their money any damned way.

President Obama expects to raise more than 1 billion dollars in direct financing of his 2012 presidential campaign alone, most of it from corporate sources and from Wall Street. This doesn't count the money going to other Democrats in the House and Senate, or Democratic candidates for governor, for state and county level judges and other offices, for state legislatures and the like. Substantially the same contributors not only fund and own both parties, but also bankroll and dictate the policy positions of organizations like the Urban League, the National Council of LaRaza, and the NAACP.

If you don't think dependence on corporate money, as a politician, or say as the National Urban League, whose keynote address this weekend was delivered by billionaires Bill Gates, makes you subservient to a corporate agenda, you're living in some other world. All the actors in this drama live at the corporate trough. That's it, and that's all.

The Deal: Supercommittees, Automatic Cuts, and Default Governing By Budget Cutting

With all the players acting their parts, the rigged game produced its expected outcome. Contrived in the imaginary universe where trickle down economics are the accepted norm, The Deal contains no new taxes on corporations and the wealthy.

President Obama announced that he has averted a crisis with more than a trillion dollars in immediate spending cuts, a number much higher than the value of the stimulus package passed at the beginning of his administration. A bipartisan “super-committee” of perhaps only a dozen Senate and House members will earmark a further $3 trillion in near term budget cuts, which will be submitted to Congress as up-or-down no-amendment, take-it-or-leave-it votes. y. And should Congress reject them, a round of automatic budget cuts dictated by some unknown formula will ensue. Medicare, Medicaid, social security, environmental protection and much more will inevitably fall.

Thus on the strength of a single vote in Congress drummed up by this fake crisis, the will of the American people has been subverted. Medicare, Medicaid and social security, if put up for popular votes would all win. If Congress had to debate them under scrutiny and take votes in public on them, Wall Street and the corporations would lose and the people would win. But that's the purpose of a modern political “crisis:” to engineer the enactment of measures on behalf of elites that normal political processes would not allow.

Welcome to the future, where a black president has been the indispensable anchor player in the con game that ended the New Deal and Great Society.

Bruce Dixon is managing editor at Black Agenda Report, and based in Marietta GA where he is on the state committee of the Georgia Green Party. He can be reached at bruce.dixon(at)blackagendareport.com. http://www.blackagendareport.com -
 

sccloser

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 27, 2010
Messages
2,378
Reaction score
848
Location
South Carolina
I'll have to drive up to DC sometime just to check and see if there is really brick, mortar and concrete buildings there. The whole place seems so phoney!
Most in Washington DC want to do the right thing...for themselves. Very few want what is best for the country.
 

longfxukxnhair

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
8,921
Reaction score
2,332
7, what you didnt point out (and Im surprised) is what this is. We all know its 6 dems and 6 repubs. Plus the president. This makes this a counsel of 13. I dont bother with that number stuff. I try to stick to things that I can prove. But I found that odd.
 

Bieling3

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Messages
2,851
Reaction score
1,096
Location
up-state New York
Yawn. Is Barack Obama a politician who is beholden to the people who gave him the money to get him where he is? Of course. Is the Tea Party beholden to the people who gave them the money to get them where they are? Absolutely. Is this Super Congress an unprecidented unconstitutional power grab that fundamentally changes our Government, no:

Details of 'super committee' are crucial in debt deal

Some reports have the committee modeled after a 2005 base-closing commission that recommended closure of dozens of military bases around the country. Under a scenario being discussed by negotiators, the committee would recommend cuts in addition to about $1.2 trillion of immediate cuts, and Congress could only vote yes or no on the recommendations, without any changes. Negotiators were also trying to come up with a trigger that would institute automatic cuts if Congress turned down its super committee's recommendation.

This is clearly set up to, like the BRAC, remove any favoritism in what gets cut. And still in the end your elected representatives can decide to vote for it or against it. The super committee makes a recommendation, the Congress as a whole votes it up or down. If they vote it down there are automatic across the board cuts... no favoritism one way or the other.

The Tea Party got everything it wanted. Deficit reduction with no revenue (tax) increases. Obama got everything he wanted. More money:

While vilifying and name-calling Wall Street executives as greedy Fat Cats who prey on the American people, President Barack Obama is garnering more Wall Street street money than all of the GOP presidential candidates put togther.

Although the financial industry hardly helped during his 2008 campaign, they are certainly funding his re-election campaign. During his heated run against Senator Hillary Clinton he campaigned as an outsider and an underdog. But now as the incumbent president, Obama has the Wall Street and banking industry executives lining up to pay homage and pay good money.

"One-third of the money Obama's elite fund-raising corps has raised on behalf of his re-election has come from the financial sector," according to a new Center for Responsive Politics analysis.

The Fat Cats who work in the finance, insurance and real estate sector are responsible for raising at least $11.8 million for Obama's campaign and for the Democratic National Committee, according to the Center's research. All of Obama's bundlers have already raised about $35 million for Obama's second juggernaut.

The part I find funny--beside people here grousing about how this has all been put on the Tea Party--is that the "Socialist" Obama is working for his money, tearing down the last remnants of The New Deal, while the Tea Party and their followers are doing it for free based on "principles." Almost like community organizing...

Together Obama and the Tea Party make quite a pair. They can take turns playing good cop bad cop to their respective base, all while working towards the same goals, and you all just gobble that $h!t up. Who are the sheep again? :lol:
 

Papus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
2,691
Reaction score
1,699
America just opened its mouth nice and wide and the Synarchist Powermongers took a nice big solid shit right in there, never even touched the sides.
 

Roadburn

New Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2010
Messages
1,786
Reaction score
569
Location
Dutchland
No one here seems to see that it is not simply the politicians who caused all this.
It is the whole damned capitalist system as we know it right now.
(Doesn't make me a communist saying this)

The con game = How to take someone else's money = The American dream.


Capitalism (as we know it) is failing miserably.
And it is the people who have no influence on it that suffer.
 

Papus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
2,691
Reaction score
1,699
This is IT - watch this space.
In 10 years when we are all living under the global big brother state we will look back on this crisis and the super congress as the pivotal action in the global takeover.
You have been warned.
 

longfxukxnhair

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
8,921
Reaction score
2,332
No one here seems to see that it is not simply the politicians who caused all this.
It is the whole damned capitalist system as we know it right now.
(Doesn't make me a communist saying this)

The con game = How to take someone else's money = The American dream.


Capitalism (as we know it) is failing miserably.
And it is the people who have no influence on it that suffer.

Capitalism is not the problem. Its the nature of man. It happens regardless of what system is in place. And capitalism as we have known it over the last 50+ years has been anything but real capitalism.

What government in the history of mankind has started at a level and moved up with regards to what they give the people? That bar never moves up. It always has come down. Thus taking more from the people in the way of money and liberties than when they started out.

It makes me laugh every time when I hear someone blame things on capitalism. Its not the system as much as it is the greed and corruption in the hearts of men. JP Morgan hates capitalism. Rockefellers hate capitalism. Walmart hates capitalism. They do not like competition. They all want control. Business does not think like or act like this. But man does. Man is the problem.
 

scat7s

Well-Known Member
VIP Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2010
Messages
13,870
Reaction score
7,294
indeed LH, 13 is an important and symbolic number to them.very few believe in satanic hocus pocus here, but as ive pointed out, ALL of the intelligence services of the most advanced nations on the planet have or have had, programs that explored every possible avenue of this.

i just saw a documentary that anton lavey was a criminologist, and worked with police as a forensic analyst before and during his establishment of the church.

michael akino was a top military psyops boss before and during his formation of the temple of set. he answered directly to the cia director, and was responsible for putting forth the idea that an 'enemy' population could be subdued thru propaganda that included 'iminent collapse of society'. hmmmm, that sounds very familiar these days, doesnt it?

these men were put into place, fostered, funded, and cared for, thru black budgets.

but i digress...
 
Last edited:

gjohnson

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
998
Reaction score
586
Location
Denver CO
No one here seems to see that it is not simply the politicians who caused all this.
It is the whole damned capitalist system as we know it right now.
(Doesn't make me a communist saying this)

The con game = How to take someone else's money = The American dream.


Capitalism (as we know it) is failing miserably.
And it is the people who have no influence on it that suffer.

WRONG!The alternative to capitalism is socialism! Socialism ie liberalism is the system that takes other peoples money AND makes everyone equally miserable.. Redistribution of wealth.
 

tonyl

New Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
726
Reaction score
196
Awesome thread again Scat.

Have a nice day.
 

JayCM800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
4,636
Reaction score
3,092
Location
New York, New York
"Bow to your Master!"

one-dollar-bill-large.jpg
 

scat7s

Well-Known Member
VIP Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2010
Messages
13,870
Reaction score
7,294
China tells U.S. "good old days" of borrowing are over - Yahoo! Finance


On Saturday August 6, 2011, 10:23 am EDT
By Walter Brandimarte and Melanie Lee
NEW YORK/SHANGHAI (Reuters) - China bluntly criticized the United States on Saturday one day after the superpower's credit rating was downgraded, saying the "good old days" of borrowing were over.
Standard & Poor's cut the U.S. long-term credit rating from top-tier AAA by a notch to AA-plus on Friday over concerns about the nation's budget deficits and climbing debt burden.
China -- the United States' biggest creditor -- said Washington only had itself to blame for its plight and called for a new stable global reserve currency.
"The U.S. government has to come to terms with the painful fact that the good old days when it could just borrow its way out of messes of its own making are finally gone," China's official Xinhua news agency said in a commentary.
After a week which saw $2.5 trillion wiped off global markets, the move deepened investors' concerns of an impending recession in the United States and over the euro zone crisis.
Finance ministers and central bankers of the Group of Seven major industrialized nations will confer by telephone later on Saturday or on Sunday, a senior European diplomatic source said.
The source said the credit rating downgrade had added a global dimension on top of the euro zone debt issue, raising the need for international coordination.
"The G7 will confer by telephone. It's not yet confirmed whether it will be in one stage or in two stages, tonight and tomorrow," the source said.
French Finance Minister Francois Baroin, who would chair such a meeting under France's G7 and G20 presidency, said it was too early to say whether there would be an early G7 gathering.
In the Xinhua commentary, China scorned the United States for its "debt addiction" and "short sighted" political wrangling.
"China, the largest creditor of the world's sole superpower, has every right now to demand the United States address its structural debt problems and ensure the safety of China's dollar assets," it said.
It urged the United States to cut military and social welfare expenditure. Further credit downgrades would very likely undermine the world economic recovery and trigger new rounds of financial turmoil, it said.
"International supervision over the issue of U.S. dollars should be introduced and a new, stable and secured global reserve currency may also be an option to avert a catastrophe caused by any single country," Xinhua said.






GLOBAL currency kids...
 

scat7s

Well-Known Member
VIP Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2010
Messages
13,870
Reaction score
7,294
another pc of coincidental info coming out today, 31 US troops killed in that downed helicopter in afghan.

31 reversed is 13.

20 of which were from seal team 6 which supposedly took out bin laden. now they make a point to say that 'they do not believe that any of these men were part of the bin laden raid'. of course not. do you believe it? i sure as hell dont

this is the thanks you get for serving your country on a super secret mission, that perhaps did not go down exactly as it was purported to. silence any who can (or maybe 'would') dispute the popular facts.

its a shame, and i feel for these men and their families. but the idea that we live in a world where coincidence is at just an uncanny level of frequency, is not believable to me.
 

longfxukxnhair

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
8,921
Reaction score
2,332
Notice the downgrade came after the market closed on Friday. It will be interesting to see how the market reacts on Monday. Im glad I invested heavily into gold and silver.
 
Top